Being Connected
Posted by Christine // pixiepixieJul 25
Today I woke up to a Facebook reply, a Twitter reply and a TextPlus reply all from the same person & as I was sending my reply on all these 3 platforms, I asked myself, “Is this crazy?”
Technology has come so far these days that to communicate with people, we run a whole multitude of platforms just to be able to reach out to everyone who doesn’t use the same social media platforms. I’m sure that is fine but when you stop to think about it, it borders on a whole level of psychoticism; or ‘tech-savvy’ if you are so inclined to be called that.
In the past, we only had pagers and we slowly evolved into mobile phone users. Even back then, mobile phones were mostly turned off most of the time and only on when we were awake. And as time past, we then evolved to keeping our mobile phones on 24/7 ‘just-in-case’. As Internet plans became more affordable and faster from 56k connections to DSL, more people were getting onto the Internet and the number of ways to ‘stay connected’ just increased like wildfire.
A rough breakdown analysis of how this works from my point-of-view of the numerous platforms used
Let me provide a simple scenario of my communications with a single person in this day and age. The following modes of communication are used: Email, MSN, SMS (Text Messaging), Twitter Direct Messages, Twitter, Facebook, Skype, TextPlus/WhatsApp. I kind of figured that some of these modes of communication are either ‘public’ or ‘private’.
Public
Twitter: For ranting, retweets (RTs) & participating in the cacophony of conversations with mutual friends, much like group chatting without the ‘instant’ factor that group chatting provides.
Facebook: Another ‘public’ way of sharing information on your own page in greater detail and also open to discussion.
Private
Email: For ‘I have tons of things to say but you are not online so I will leave an email’ or ‘I’m just forwarding an interesting email someone sent me’.
SMS (Text Messaging): For instant/urgent things to be communicated since you are not online/on-the-go.
Twitter Direct Messages: For private rantings and a substitute for short emails/SMS without needing an instant reply.
MSN: For normal text-based conversation.
Skype: Ever useful new substitute for MSN & mobile phones. For calling, video-calling and text-based conversation.
TextPlus/WhatsApp: New to the scene with the advent of 3G mobile phones, this is the cheaper alternative to SMS by running mobile phone applications that communicate phone-to-phone without spending a single cent sending that text message and still achieving the same ‘instantness’.
By taking conversation topics to so many platforms, it seems like not responding via the method the message was originally communicated by would break the topic. Imagine if instead of replying via all the platforms and I simply just gathered all my responses into a single platform to respond on, my message would just be garbled because everything would be taken out of context.
The question to ponder is, is it possible to stay connected and still be in context without exposing ourselves to a large number of modes of communication in this very technologically-driven era? Or will we die if we stick to just one?


















